BIC is partnering with Asociación Ambiente y Sociedad, Asdown, and Renacer to monitor the design and implementation of the BML2 and engage in advocacy around: a) how the project will incorporate the mitigation hierarchy to avoid and minimize impacts to biodiversity (with special considerations to critical habitats) and consider climate change mitigation and adaptation in its development and implementation; b) how the project will be accessible for persons with disabilities; and c) how risks of child sexual exploitation, abuse, and harassment (SEA/H) are addressed.
To identify lessons learned for improving Bogotá Metro Line 2, our partners also reviewed the project design and conducted fieldwork on the implementation of the Bogotá Metro Line 1, which is currently under construction with financing from the World Bank and other financial institutions. This analysis aimed to identify key gaps and opportunities for improvement. BIC, along with our partners, has identified the following concerns:
Stakeholder engagement and access to information. Partners found that the consultations carried out did not include all relevant groups in the Project’s direct and indirect impact areas. For example, only three disability groups are listed in the BML2 Stakeholder Engagement Plan (Plan de Participación de Partes Interesadas) as having been consulted. The disability groups engaged during field visits shared that they have not been provided with the necessary information to understand the possible impacts of the project or actively participate in the planning. As a result, not only have they been unable to use their experience and expertise to contribute to the design of an inclusive and accessible metro, but they also have not been informed or had the opportunity to provide input on mitigating potential risks. Also, there has been no engagement with children, youth, or child rights institutions on how SEA/H risks may impact children differently and the targeted measures to address these. For example, students in schools located near construction sites may face particular risks that have not been assessed. This demonstrates that there has been a lack of clear information on the potential environmental and social risks and impacts associated with the two projects.
Adverse impact on wetlands of international importance. One of the main environmental concerns in the BML2 is the potential impact of the project on two wetlands that have been recognized as Ramsar sites and are classified as critical habitats under the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Framework (ESF). The current project documents do not clearly identify the scope of expected impacts and risks on wetlands, which would include earthworks, changes in hydrology, and water and soil pollution. Water contamination is also likely to have an adverse social impact as it poses a threat to health and livelihoods. Our partners reported that local disability councils shared that persons with disabilities may face a higher risk of infection due to organic water contamination. The project documents also neglect to mention that the wetlands are heritage sites of the Muisca Indigenous Peoples of Suba.
Climate considerations are missing from project design. Bogotá is highly vulnerable to climate change, particularly extreme heat, heavy rain and flooding, fires, landslides, and earthquakes. Despite recognizing Bogotá’s vulnerability, the project documents do not explain the measures that will be incorporated into the project design to reduce climate risks and enhance resilience. The project design should clearly state how it will be resilient to climate change and maintain service in the event of extreme weather. It is also important to recognize how climate change disproportionately impacts marginalized groups, such as persons with disabilities. For instance, Bogotá experiences the urban heat island effect, and extreme heat can cause destabilization in people who use prostheses, wheelchairs, or other devices that are affected by high temperatures. The project design should take into consideration how persons with disabilities could be impacted by climate change and incorporate specific adaptation measures in the design.
Barriers to mobility. During field visits, persons with disabilities shared that they experience barriers impeding their mobility. For example, some cab drivers refuse to transport those who use wheelchairs, and there are accessibility barriers in the current public transport system which make it difficult for persons with disabilities to reliably use public transport.
Grievance redress mechanisms. The BML2 plans to rely on the grievance redress mechanism (GRM) established for the BML1. This raises concerns, as the existing GRM lacks child-friendly features, such as multiple reporting channels and accessibility in spaces frequented by children and youth, like schools and parks.